Choice Integrated Healthcare

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920949087
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Chandler, AZ, US
Phone
480-656-5374
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Mental Health Center

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,381
Expenses
$200,632
Assets
$192,481
Liabilities
$172,453

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Nicole Smith (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Nicole Smith (CEO)
  • Medelyn DeBeor (Clinical Manager)
  • Mary Thompson RN (Director of Nursing)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve the lives of individuals, their families and the communities in which they live, by addressing Social Determinants of Health and Integrating that with evidenced based sound Clinical practices woven with modern Medical understanding of the human condition.

What it reported doing in 2024

Choice Integrated HealthCare INC Choice Integrated HealthCare is a nonprofit behavioral health organization providing integrated mental health, substance use, and crisis services to individuals and families in Arizona, including underserved and high-trauma populations. Typically CALOCUS/LOCUS level 4. During the reporting year, the organization delivered comprehensive outpatient behavioral health services focused on accurate diagnosis, trauma-informed care, and continuity across levels of care. Services included psychiatric evaluation, medication management, individual and group counseling, case management, care coordination, and social determinants of health support. The organization operates under an integrated clinical model designed to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce fragmented treatment. Comprehensive behavioral health assessments are conducted using extended evaluation protocols, incorporating mental health history, medical history, trauma history, social determinants of health, risk assessment, and standardized clinical tools. This model is designed to reduce misdiagnosis, improve treatment alignment, and decrease repeated entry into higher levels of care. The organization provided services to Medicaid, Medicare, commercially insured, and uninsured individuals, with a significant proportion of services delivered to underserved and high-risk populations, including Native communities and individuals experiencing significant trauma exposure. Core program accomplishments include: Delivery of integrated outpatient behavioral health services to individuals experiencing serious mental illness, substance use disorders, trauma-related disorders, and co-occurring conditions. Implementation of a structured non-confrontational, trauma-informed care model designed to preserve dignity and reduce escalation in high-acuity environments. Development and implementation of a comprehensive assessment system designed to meet and exceed evolving state standards for behavioral health evaluation. Coordination of care across providers and levels of service to support continuity and reduce gaps in treatment. Establishment of partnerships with community stakeholders to expand access to behavioral health services in underserved regions. The organization continues to expand its integrated continuum of care model to include intensive outpatient programming and crisis stabilization services, with the goal of improving access, reducing emergency department utilization, and promoting long-term recovery outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1,124.8%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.9; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 35.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $201K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.