Choice in Aging

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942822559
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Pleasant Hill, CA, USA
Phone
9256826330
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rehabilitative Medical Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,750,533
Expenses
$9,645,506
Assets
$20,999,862
Liabilities
$1,498,402

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBBIE TOTH (MEMBERS/ CEO & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DEBBIE TOTH (MEMBERS/ CEO & PRESIDENT): $149,921 total reported compensation
  • LETECIA HOLLY TILLMAN (VP OF OPERATIONS): $113,494 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote the dignity and independence of people with disabilities and special needs.

What it reported doing in 2024

The multipurpose senior services program (mssp), which served 383 clients within the year, is a medi-cal program that provides intensive care management and services to people 60+ who meet the criteria to be placed in a skilled nursing facility but would prefer to remain in their own homes. The program helps prevent or delay nursing home placement by providing a complete assessment of the client's physical, mental, and social well-being. The mssp nurse and social worker partner with the participants, their doctors, and caregivers to create personalized care plans that support living safely at home.services provided through mssp may include minor home modification, supplemental personal and chore care, respite, transportation, counseling, therapy, meals, translation support, and other services.the state of California budgeted $1,071,200 for 200 mssp participants, which equals approximately $5,356 per participant per year for the mssp program. In comparison, nursing facility costs are approximately $130,000 per person per year.based upon individual needs, mssp arranges for services available in the community. If eligible, the program may purchase items and services not covered by medi-cal or medicare, such as: supplemental personal and chore care respite care home safety equipment, such as ramps and grab bars personal emergency response system counseling transportation to medical appointments minor home modifications incontinence supplies

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 61
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 94
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Program expense ratio: 79.7%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.4%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.18; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 79.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $7.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $150K · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $604K reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.