Chocolate Soul Revival Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
853706399
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Durham, NC, USA
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Womens' Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,301
Expenses
$95,363
Assets
$34,263

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ratasha Huff (President and Director)

People named in this filing

  • Ratasha Huff (President and Director)
  • Delorian Miller (Treasurer and Director)
  • AJordan Replacement Search Underway (Secretary and Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charitable Educational and Scientific Purposes and Powers. The purposes of the Corporation as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation are exclusively charitable educational or religious within the meaning of section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended or the corresponding provision of any future Federal tax law Section 501c3. The specific purposes of the Corporation are to create arts infused healing justice processes to support women and girls in restoring wholeness clarity and both personal and collective power.

What it reported doing in 2024

Chocolate Soul Revival Inc. supports women and girls in moving through individual and collective grief trauma and oppression into clarity power and action. Inside of healing justice we focus on areas including emotional resilience trauma healing deconstructing internalized oppression and liberatory skill building. In addition to individuals and groups we also worked directly with other aligned organizations in shifting from a burnout and harm replicating culture into one of emotional safety nourishment and long term sustainability. We seek to stop the replication of trauma and harm throughout our communities and therefore also offered organizational consulting support. We conducted individual sessions small group circles workshops and participated in panel discussions to help advance community mental health and emotional wellbeing support and greater collective mental health and emotional wellbeing literacy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 57.5%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 40.4%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 57.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.