Chmc Community Health Services Network

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311459815
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Cincinnati, OH, USA
Phone
5138031106
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,705,477
Expenses
$40,119,825
Assets
$38,826,566
Liabilities
$68,908,323

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY ANDERSON MD (CHAIRMAN & PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • STEVE DAVIS MD (FMR. OFFICER): $2,814,850 total reported compensation
  • PAUL JENNY (TRUSTEE): $1,470,070 total reported compensation
  • EVALINE ALESSANDRINI (TRUSTEE): $1,445,167 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Chmc community health services network ("chsn") is organized and operated exclusively to support cincinnati children's hospital medical center ("cchmc") in cchmc's efforts to provide medical services to all of the children in the community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Cincinnati children's hospital medical center ("cchmc") is devoted to providing medical services to all of the children in the community. Chmc community health services network ("chsn") is organized and operated exclusively to support cchmc in this effort by reaching out to children and their families in neighborhoods of our community. Chsn serves as the structure for bringing medical professionals who share the vision of providing quality medical care to children and families in the neighborhoods in which they live. Chsn carries out its charitable purposes by seeking and hiring such "mission oriented physicians. In addition, chsn will make medical professionals an integral part of these neighborhoods by establishing sites within these communities where resident physicians will work. The resident physicians will be able to learn more about the patients they seek to serve and thereby provide better service to them. Furthermore, in order to ensure its goals are met, chsn will act as a liaison between the neighborhoods and cchmc, and will focus on how to best meet the unique needs of all children in neighborhoods of our community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 60
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -56.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.97; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.77; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $2.8M · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 19 of 19 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.