Chiz's Heart Street Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201584080
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2019
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2019, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Kingston, NY, USA
- Phone
- 8453997891
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Homes
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $289,140
- Expenses
- $287,610
- Assets
- $15,214
- Liabilities
- $100
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- SHARON M CHISHOLM (DIRECTOR): $62,997 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Chiz's heart street seeks to provide a supervised, supportive living facility to non-institutional individuals as referedded by health care providers and or dss. Chiz's heart street will provide 24-hour residential care services to individuals who suffer with mental illness or incapacity and or abuse recovery. The number of persons whom benefit from this varies on a monthly basis, but ranges from 15-25.
What it reported doing in 2019
Chiz's heart street seeks to provide a suprervised, supportive living facility to non-institutional individuals as referred by health care providers and or dss. Chiz's heart street will provide 24-hour residential care services to individuals who suffer with, mental illness or incapacity and or abuse recovery. The number of persons whom benefit from this varies on a monthly basis, but ranges from 15-25.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Limited
- Other executive compensation review process: Limited
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.9%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $248K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $63K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.