Chinese Family for Christ USA Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 651276625
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- West Covina, CA, USA
- Phone
- 6263377200
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $679,997
- Expenses
- $756,779
- Assets
- $937,024
- Liabilities
- $33,053
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Highest reported compensation
- WEI HAO (Director): $93,228 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To seek cooperation with the Chinese church through preventing, training, researching and counseling in order to consolidate the followers' marriage and family. By achieving so, disciple can devote herself or himself to the Lord completely.
What it reported doing in 2025
1. All followers' marriage and family have been consolidated and enhanced through our programs and counseling.2. All fellowers now have more confidence and ability to solve issues rising from marriage.3. All fellowers can devote themselves to complete more missions than before.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.5%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 60.7%; rating input score 61
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.5% of revenue deployed · 60.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 1 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $459K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $93K · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 25 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.