Childrens Services Foundation Dba Catalyst Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 942901623
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Sacramento, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9164492273
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,604,897
- Expenses
- $15,393,882
- Assets
- $22,430,681
- Liabilities
- $4,172,064
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Chris Stoner Mertz (CEO)
- CAMILLE SCHRAEDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- Ron Brown (Past President)
- Beth Parsons (President)
- Kathy McCarthy (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- Chris Stoner Mertz (CEO): $284,383 total reported compensation
- CAMILLE SCHRAEDER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $253,556 total reported compensation
- JESSICA ROSENBAUM (DR OF NETWORK OP): $220,253 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promoting the health, well-being and safety of children, youth and families in California as a collective voice impacting policy and best practices to strengthen the systems that serve them.
What it reported doing in 2024
Catalyst CenterThe Catalyst Center is the operational heart of our work, delivering training, technical assistance, research, the Apprenticeship program, the Open Doors program, and a wide range of supports that strengthen child and family-serving organizations across the state. EventsThe Catalyst Center team provides the field with access to skilled technical assistance providers who build networks across California, deepen cross-sector relationships, and help ensure that communityneeds and lived experience remain central to practice and system improvement.Across this work, the Catalyst Center ensures that members are equipped with practical tools, responsive support, and data-driven insights. By building statewide networks, removing barriers to service delivery, and supporting organizations in real time, the Catalyst Center remains a vital resource for members and a cornerstone of the CA Alliances mission to improve outcomes for children, youth, and families throughout California.Technical AssistanceTechnical Assistance (TA) is an essential service we provide, ensuring that organizations across California have the support they need with complex challenges. The TA team works side by sidewith providers and county agencies, offering timely information, problem-solving, and expert consultation that strengthens care for children, youth, and families.In 2025, they delivered more than 1,000 technical assistance services, supporting agencies in 35 counties through both DHCS and CDSS contracts. Assistance spanned key areas including IMD determinations, STRTP Mental Health Program Approval, Childrens Crisis Residential Programs, PRTF development, Payment Reform, and Presumptive Transfer. More than 560 staff hours were dedicated to help organizations navigate evolving policy requirements.The TA team also facilitated 32 Youth Resource Workgroups (YRW), providing trauma-informed, youth-centered consultation on complex cases involving integration of care, educational advocacy, behavioral health supports, and gender-affirming services. Additional efforts included supporting STRTP providers through the Youth-Centered Continuous Quality Improvement Framework and launching work to build statewide infrastructure for the Childrens Crisis Continuum Pilot Program.Catalyst Learning CenterThe Catalyst Learning Center (CLC) continued to grow as a statewide resource for professional learning, delivering high-quality training and skill-building opportunities to strengthen the child and family services workforce. Through virtual courses, in-person workshops, conference sessions, and an expanding on-demand library, the CLC made accessible, practical learning available to organizations across California.The CLC continued to prioritize flexible learning through its on-demand and recorded offerings, removing barriers related to geography, scheduling, and staff capacity. These courses covered a wide range of topics, including trauma-informed practice, policy updates, mental health and wellness, andorganizational leadership. 247.5 LEARNING HRS 104 COURSES 98% SATISFACTION RATEIn 2025, the CLC delivered 247.5 total learning hours across 104 courses, supporting more than 300 community-based organizations in 44 counties. This year also saw significant growth in engagement, with 3,252 new learning accounts created and an average of 675 unique monthly users accessing courses and resources. Learner satisfaction remained exceptionally high, with a 98 percent course satisfaction rate, reflecting both the quality and relevance of the CLCs offerings.In addition to year-round programming, the CLC hosted 78 workshops, providing participants with actionable tools and CEU-eligible sessions. These workshops brought together expert trainers, policymakers, practitioners, and individuals with lived experience to ensure that learning remained grounded, practical, and aligned with needs in the field.ResearchThe Research Team is the behind-the-scenes engine, strengthening policy
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 77% for direct work, and 23% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 58.2%; rating input score 58
- Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $274.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.9%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.2%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 63.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 46.1% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 46.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 58.2% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $14.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $284K · 28 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 55 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 50 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.