Children's Voice of North Texas
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464111492
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Corinth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9402301313
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $58,703
- Expenses
- $24,749
- Assets
- $196,270
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- FRANKIE SANFORD (DIRECTOR)
- DONALD V CARR (DIRECTOR)
- TIFFANY SANFORD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We founded children's voice of north Texas in 2013 to help parents just like usparents who want their child who is hearing impaired to communicate through listening and speaking. When our daughter was born with severe- to-profound hearing loss, we were unsure what to do and spent the first six weeks trying to find out why she failed her newborn hearing screening and what it meant. When we were told that our newborn was deaf (and that it wasn't just fluid causing a temporary hearing loss), our minds raced wondering what to do, where to go and who to trust with the decisions that lay before us as parents and for our childs future. After learning about different options and technologies, we chose the auditory-verbal path for speech and language so our child will be able to communicate with everyone. Our daughter was initially fitted with hearing AIDS when she was four months old, had cochlear implant surgery at one-year of age and is preparing to attend kindergarten in a mainstream classr
What it reported doing in 2025
Giving children with hearing impairment a voice.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 39%; rating input score 39
- Program expense ratio: 92.5%; rating input score 92
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.8%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.93; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 39% of revenue deployed · 92.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.