Children's Scholarship Fund Philadelphia

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
233078729
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2156708411
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,928,194
Expenses
$17,599,498
Assets
$27,785,875
Liabilities
$938,977

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KEISHA JORDAN (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KEISHA JORDAN (PRESIDENT & CEO): $242,715 total reported compensation
  • JENNIFER BURNS (CHIEF ADVANCEMENT OFFICER): $193,876 total reported compensation
  • JULIA RAIKEN (CHIEF PROGRAM OFFICER): $191,269 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

With over 20 years of experience and over 30,000 scholarships awarded, csfp provides philadelphia children with eight-year, needs-based scholarships to attend safe, quality, k-8th grade schools. Continued on schedule o.supporting under-resourced children and families, up to 3 children in a family may receive a scholarship. Students are selected from a random, needs based lottery.

What it reported doing in 2024

Children's scholarship fund philadelphia (csfp) is a privately-funded program whose mission is to provide children from under-resourced philadelphia families with financial access to quality, safe, k-8th grade, tuition-based schools, thereby increasing their long-term economic and social success. Csfp grants need-based, partial scholarships through a random lottery. During 2024, csfp served 6,553 children enrolled at over 150 parochial and private schools.continued on schedule o.csfp provides additional programming in service to scholarship recipients called camp connections, which is a summer program in which scholarship recipients are invited to attend a weeklong camp through partnerships with local universities. The purpose of camp connections is to combat "summer slide", the loss of academic progress over the summer break from school, by providing an enriching and fun opportunity for scholarship recipients to learn, grow, and be challenged outside of the traditional school environment.csfp has also created the program ambassador (pa) program in which parents/guardians of scholarship recipients serve as a representative within their child's school, acting as a key contact for families to strengthen relationships between schools, the community, and csfp staff. Pas participate in school events on behalf of csfp, communicate with existing families about student verification records, registrations, and events, and engage with prospective families interested in applying for scholarships. They also collaborate with school administrators to support scholar families, regularly check and respond to emails from csfp and families, and attend mandatory meetings, including orientation, monthly check-ins, and a winter update meeting.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 91% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 87
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Program expense ratio: 89.9%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $17.55 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.9%; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 1.8%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.2%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 89.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $15.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $243K · 25 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $140K reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.