Children's Mental Health Coalition of Western New York Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522239517
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2012, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Amherst, NY, USA
- Phone
- 7168718997
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $3,401
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LUCILLE SHERLICK PHD (PRESIDENT)
- MARY T SKORUPA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MELODY MORRIS (DIRECTOR)
- DAWN MCNIFF (SECRETARY)
- LUCILLE SHERLICK PHD (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a grass roots, parent run organization committed to ensuring that families of children with behavioral, social, emotional, developmental and learning challenges have access to needed information, support and services within western New York. The organization does this by working to strengthen family support services, promote awareness of children's mental health issues, and foster equal partnerships between parents/caretakers and children's service providers of all types.
What it reported doing in 2020
Provide a voice for families of children with emotional, behavioral, social, developmental, and learning challenges served by our general membership peer family support entities in 19 counties in wny via the director's participation in child serving planning councils, community education forums, gathering actual family voice input for reporting to service planning committees, etc. The number of families receiving direct educational services and support from the organization is approximately more than 300.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.9% per year; rating input score 0; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.