Children's Law Center of Minnesota

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411761589
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6516444438
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Legal Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$952,363
Expenses
$1,041,381
Assets
$1,229,961
Liabilities
$43,909

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

30 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN DIOURY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)

Highest reported compensation

  • SUSAN DIOURY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY): $137,763 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Children's law center of Minnesota promotes and protects the legal rights and well-being of children and youth through legal advocacy, educational outreach, and policy reform.

What it reported doing in 2025

Clc served 402 clients in 2025 and saw 119 cases to completion. Of these youth, 51% (204) are female, 49% (198) are male; 65% (263) of the cases are within ramsey county, 34% (138) are in hennepin county; 1% in Washington county. All clc clients are young people in foster care in mn, mostly between ages 10-21. Clc serves a high minority population, many of whom identify as more than one race. Specifically, 152 (38%) are black/african-american, 130 (32%) are two or more races, 30 (8%) are asian, 8 (2%) are hispanic-latino, 7 (2%) are native american but do not qualify for icwa, 19 (5%) are icwa eligible, and 56 (14%) are white. 74% of clients were members of a sibling group. Of the 402 cases 55% cases were assigned in house to staff attorneys and 45% of the cases were assigned to volunteer attorneys. 55% of clc clients who were eligible for high school graduation successfully completed their studies on time, with 7% of those students planning to enroll in college this fall. In contrast, 35% of senior clients were still striving to earn their diploma. While these figures reflect a decrease compared to our earlier graduation rates, they align with the overall decline in graduation rates observed statewide for foster students.in 2025, clc staff served on, or participate in, over 14 external committees and organizations including the mn supreme court council on child protection, children's justice initiative, statewide cji advisory committee, statewide cji mental health subcommittee, mifpa phase ii, children's justice act task force, hennepin and ramsey county children's justice initiative groups, mn rules of juvenile protection procedure committee, state board of appellate counsel and training, and the msba and aba children and law sections.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.3%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 67.9%; rating input score 68
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.2%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.3% of revenue deployed · 67.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 26 of 26 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $707K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $138K · 30 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.