Children's Healthy Pantry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461022470
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Sarasota, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9413500080
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nutrition
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,655
- Expenses
- $98,336
- Assets
- $17,588
- Liabilities
- $229
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN MORIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EX-OFF)
- CAROLYN BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
- RABBI JONATHAN KATZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JACKIE TAXDAL (TREASURER)
- SUSAN MORIN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EX-OFF)
- CAROLYN BLUM (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Children's healthy pantry, incorporated's mission is to provide healthy snack foods and water to at-risk children during the school week.
What it reported doing in 2018
We currently have pantries for children, called the "children's healthy pantry", in twelve schools in sarasota and manatee counties. These pantries are stocked with healthy snack foods and bottled water.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.8%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -16.2%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 23.2% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.