Children's Flight of Hope

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
561762824
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Raleigh, NC, US
Phone
919.466.8593
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,025,843
Expenses
$3,822,094
Assets
$3,420,562
Liabilities
$537,486

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PAT NELLI (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PAT NELLI (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $187,431 total reported compensation
  • LEIGH LONGINO (COO): $143,642 total reported compensation
  • BERRI O'NEAL GORMLEY (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $127,188 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To save and enhance lives by providing flights for children with serious medical conditions, ensuring distance and cost are never barriers to accessing specialized care.

What it reported doing in 2025

Children's flight of hope (cfoh) removes barriers to specialized pediatric medical care by providing free air transportation for children with rare, complex, and life-threatening medical conditions. Through the generosity of donors, sponsors, airline partners, and community supporters, cfoh provides flights for a child and one parent or guardian as often as needed throughout the healthcare journey.without cfoh, many families would be forced to postpone treatment, travel thousands of miles by car, incur significant financial hardship, or forgo access to specialized care altogether. Cfoh believes that neither distance nor the cost of travel should prevent a child from receiving lifechanging or lifesaving medical treatment. (continued on schedule o)the organization serves children traveling to nationally recognized hospitals and centers of excellence that offer specialized care unavailable in their local communities.in 2025, cfoh provided 2,714 flights for 703 children from across the united states more than doubling our impact in four years, helping families access care at 89 hospitals and medical centers. These flights supported children facing more than 230 unique diagnoses, including pediatric cancers, rare genetic disorders, and other complex medical conditions. Many children required repeated travel over months or years to receive treatment, surgeries, clinical trials, and follow-up care.cfoh utilizes a cost-effective commercial airline model that allows the organization to maximize resources and serve more families while maintaining the flexibility to meet each child's unique medical travel needs. All applicants undergo a comprehensive review process that verifies medical necessity and financial need, with annual recertification requirements to ensure responsible stewardship of charitable resources and continued eligibility for services.the long-term objective of cfoh is to ensure that every child, regardless of where they live or a family's financial circumstances, can access the specialized medical care needed to achieve the best possible health outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 73
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 73.1%; rating input score 73
  • Fundraising efficiency: $6.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Limited
    • Conducts field audits: Limited
    • May suspend future funding: Limited
    • Requires financial reports: Limited
    • Conducts site visits: Limited
    • Requires grant agreements: Limited
    • May require repayment: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.7%; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 5.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.9% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 70% of revenue deployed · 73.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $187K · 17 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 28/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.