Children's Developmental Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
910876634
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Richland, WA, USA
Phone
5097351062
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Kindergarten, Preschool, Nursery School, Early Admissions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,772,931
Expenses
$4,800,036
Assets
$5,930,049
Liabilities
$275,630

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ZAHRA ROACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ZAHRA ROACH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $131,360 total reported compensation
  • MALORY TORRES (FINANCE MANAGER): $104,445 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization empowers familities and improves children's lives through comprehensive early intervention services, education, and therapeutic services. The organization primarily offers services to children from birth to three years with developmental delays.

What it reported doing in 2024

During fiscal year 2024-2025, the center provided services to children across benton and franklin counties. On average, we served 152 children from benton county and 171 children from franklin county through our early support for infants and toddlers program. This gives a combined average of 325 children served each month over all counties we serve. This program received an average of 53 referrals per month, with approximately 49% qualifying for services.due to the financial sustainability in our early support for infants and toddlers program we have been able to start other opportunities to help families. We have started a hospital to home program which helps families transition babies in the nicu to receive positive medical outcomes. We also ran a quarterly child behavior management workshop for those children enrolled in our program. These classes are focused more on how the parents can implement things at home to help with behavior.our applied behavior analysis (aba) program was discontinued as of june 30, 2025, with plans to explore opportunities to reinstate these services in the future. The pediatric pelvic health program continued to serve an average of 58 children, consistent with the prior fiscal year. Pediatric pelvic health program has historically run at a deficit but with hard work on schedule changes and grant writing the last two fiscal years have been self-sustaining.across all three programs, the center served a total of 836 children during the fiscal year, delivering 21,948 direct service appointments.compliance and quality assurance - in addition, we received our annual determination letter from the department of children, youth, and families (dcyf), the state agency for which we are a contracted provider. The center achieved 100% compliance with no recommendations for improvement - marking our fourth consecutive year of receiving this rating.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.8%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 75.9%; rating input score 76
  • Fundraising efficiency: $2.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.9%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.6% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.8% of revenue deployed · 75.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $3.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $131K · 10 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $110K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.