Children's Clinics for Rehabilitative Services

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
860667510
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Tucson, AZ, USA
Phone
5203245437
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ambulatory Health Center, Community Clinic

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,789,892
Expenses
$15,471,730
Assets
$12,539,003
Liabilities
$2,675,136

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JARED PERKINS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
  • TRACY NUCKOLLS (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • JOHN STEPHENS MD (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID CRAWFORD (PHYSICIAN): $457,235 total reported compensation
  • JARED PERKINS (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $300,959 total reported compensation
  • REBECCA EGBERT (PHYSICIAN): $248,317 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The children's clinics provides a family centered comprehensive medical home to meet the special needs of children and families.

What it reported doing in 2024

Children's clinics offers southern Arizona's families a unique environment to meet the health care needs of their children with more than 60+ medical and dental specialty clinics, primary care, behavioral health, and therapy services under one roof. Children's clinics is a non-profit organization providing family-centered, comprehensive outpatient primary care, specialty care and rehabilitative therapy services in a comfortable and engaging atmosphere. Children's clinics is accessible to the entire community, serving children from birth to young adulthood. In addition to general pediatrics, many of our children have complex medical conditions such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida, muscular dystrophy, cardiac conditions, cleft lip and palate, sickle cell, and metabolic disorders.a large number of staff and providers are bilingual spanish speakers and translation services are available for all languages. Children's clinics is the southern Arizona provider for the state children's rehabilitative services program. Children's clinics accepts most private insurances, ahcccs health plans, and private-pay patients. The clinic also recognizes that children with special healthcare needs don't often have the opportunity to participate in some of the "normal experiences of childhood" such as trick or treating or pictures with santa. Children's clinics frequently has special programming onsite to help deliver these experiences to our patients and families. Services are provided through a unique partnership of community physicians, university of Arizona health network physicians, children's clinics staff and therapists at one location. This partnership ensures coordination of care that is especially critical for children with complex health care needs. Children's clinics is a joint commission accredited program that focuses on delivering high quality care. Children's clinics is co-located with other child-serving organizations such as raising special kids and the autism society that offer additional support to our patients and families.geographic service area: primary service area includes zip codes for all of pima, santa cruz, cochise, graham, and greenlee counties, as well as southern and central pima county and the southern tip of gila county (winkleman/hayden area). Some referral patients come from outside this primary service area for selected specialty services.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 79
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86.9%; rating input score 87
  • Program expense ratio: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11.2%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.8% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86.9% of revenue deployed · 87.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $13.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $457K · 21 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $1.6M reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.