Children's Cancer Research Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411893645
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9528939355
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,470,407
- Expenses
- $7,246,253
- Assets
- $11,242,965
- Liabilities
- $7,718,147
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ELIZABETH ALLEN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
People named in this filing
- ELIZABETH ALLEN (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- ABBIE MILLER MD (CHAIRPERSON)
- CHRIS ZUPFER (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.
What it reported doing in 2025
Research and granting programs: in fy25, ccrf awarded nearly $2.3 million in research grants in the following areas: - hard-to-treat cancers: ccrf prioritizes research on cancers with persistently low survival rates. These include highly aggressive and often fatal cancers such as brain tumors, sarcomas, and certain types of leukemia. In fy25, we awarded $250,000 to fund a project at md andersen cancer center testing a novel drug candidate that targets a key driver of acute myeloid leukemia (aml). We also awarded $187,799 to a researcher at the university of Minnesota who is working on new treatments enabling immune cells to better infiltrate high-risk brain tumors, including diffuse midline glioma and glioblastoma. If successful, this research would further improve the efficacy of a novel immunotherapy developed by university of Minnesota researchers with ccrf support. Finally, we awarded $375,000 to the university of Minnesota in seed grants for research initiatives, allowing flexible and nimble funding for emerging opportunities. - survivorship: many childhood cancer survivors live with enduring consequences of chemotherapy, radiation, or surgical interventions, including cognitive impairment, cardiac issues and infertility. Ccrf supports researchers working on new treatments and interventions that will reduce adverse long-term effects and promote health among survivors. In fy25, ccrf granted $250,000 to a researcher at children's hospital of philadelphia to conduct a randomized trial of a game-like technology aimed at helping brain tumor survivors better understand facial cues and build critical social connections. - fellowships: ccrf made a commitment of $1.2 million in fy25 to support the children's cancer research fund pediatric oncology/hematology fellowship program at the university of Minnesota. This commitment builds on nearly 40 years of support for research fellowships at the university of Minnesota, a program with a strong legacy of training exceptional leaders in pediatric cancer care and research.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 27
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -62.1%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $5.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 37 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 7 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.