Children of Bellevue
Legal name: Children of Bellevue Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 131679615
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, US
- Phone
- 212-562-4141
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $419,084
- Expenses
- $1,011,177
- Assets
- $1,859,826
- Liabilities
- $314,671
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH BETH LARDIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR UNTIL 10/2024)
- MEGHAN MOLONEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STARTING 11/2024)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH BETH LARDIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR UNTIL 10/2024): $148,058 total reported compensation
- MEGHAN MOLONEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STARTING 11/2024): $31,718 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Children of Bellevue supports the health and well-being of children and families at NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue through programs in child protection, adolescent prenatal care, and mental health.
What it reported doing in 2024
In and out patient pediatric support - the in and out patient departments at bellevue serve hundreds of families a month with routine, acute, and chronic health challenges. Children of bellevue's support, in partnership with the child life team, provides goods and services to these families. Francis loeb child protection - the francis loeb child protection center is a first of its kind in nyc co-located specialty center for victims of abuse within a hospital. With coordinated staffing across disciplines, families that suffer from abuse can get wrap-around services without having to go to multiple locations. Children of bellevue's support provides goods and services to these families.adolescent prenatal program - the adolescent prenatal program provides education and support services to expecting mothers and their families. This includes classes and yoga along with baby care items. Children of bellevue provides the funding for the yoga and care items.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 47.3%; rating input score 47
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -141.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.84; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 47.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $479K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $148K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 28 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: CEO compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.