Children of Abraham

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814004034
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Rock Hill, SC, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$52
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • William H Read (President - Secretary - Treasurer)

People named in this filing

  • William H Read (President - Secretary - Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Part III Header: Organizations primary purpose: The primary purpose of Children of Abraham is to improve relations among Jews Christians and Muslims by providing activities and events that will allow the members of all faiths to get to know each other through personal contact.

What it reported doing in 2023

Children of Abraham was created to bring people of various faiths together so they could learn about each other. During the COVID-19 Pandemic we were asked to have no person-to-person gatherings not even in person board of director meetings. During that time membership decreased to zero. We even had trouble retaining board members. It is no longer a functioning association and there is only one remaining officer. On September 29 2023 the remaining officer director decided to terminate the organization. As required by the Revenue Code the funds remaining in Children of Abrahams checking account $321 were transferred to Hope Inc. a local 501c3 food bank. Hope Inc. is also known as Hope House. The one remaining officer declared the termination of Children of Abraham. In short for 2023 there were no programs attempted no accomplishments no revenue and only $52 of postage and administrative expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 34.6% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -34.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -28.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $373 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.