Children in Action Sports Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262717334
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Brunswick, GA, USA
- Phone
- 9122307760
- Rating
- 96
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $97,004
- Expenses
- $123,282
- Assets
- $48,134
- Liabilities
- $17,080
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLEN BENNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ALLEN BENNER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- PEDRO GONZALEZ (DIRECTOR)
- CHAD NEAL (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization utilizes sports and physical activities as an outreach to children, youth and adults to build character, excellence, and teamwork. By increasing physical activity, as a team, our programs put into action the gospel of jesus christ through relationship building, character building, and one-on-one interactions with participants during practice, game and devotion times.
What it reported doing in 2023
To encourage christ-like growth and development in our youth through the influence of athletics and coaches
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.1%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2011 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.