Children Conquering Cancer Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 843016064
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Franklin, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8122074514
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $51,113
- Expenses
- $27,829
- Assets
- $27,844
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GLEN VAN FOSSEN (Vice President)
- TANNER WESP (President)
People named in this filing
- JOSHUA SOLOWEY (Director)
- GLEN VAN FOSSEN (Vice President)
- SARAH WESP (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Organization principally exists to (a) educate the public on and raise awareness about the issues surrounding cancer and its various treatments in away that puts an emphasis on faith; (b) provide support to the hospitals and other treatment centers to increase their ability to research, treat, andimprove the children's time spent in the hospitals; and support the family directly by soliciting and receiving funds in their name. (c) solicit and receive funds for the accomplishment of the above purposes; and (d) pursue any otherpurpose permitted to be pursued by a charity (or, by a private foundation should this organization ever become a private foundation), as that term isdefined in 26 USC 501(a) and (c)(3) and associated regulations, as each may from time to time be amended.
What it reported doing in 2022
We are currently working to build relationships with local children's hospitals and build our donor base.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 22
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 17.1%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.6%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 166.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 143.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 17.1% of revenue deployed · 31.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $9K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2021 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.