Child Study Clinic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741977674
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2009, Form 990-T 2022
- Location
- Victoria, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3615750681
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $258,762
- Expenses
- $234,721
- Assets
- $26,708
- Liabilities
- $33,152
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- SHERRAE BRISSETTE (DIRECTOR)
- ROSLYN FAUST (DIRECTOR)
- BECKIE GARCIA (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Evaulation of children with suspected physical or emotional problems. The clinic serves in a supportative partnership with medical, educational and psycho-social services for children with special health care needs, so that total care is provided in a context that is family centered, community based and culturally competent. The clinic provides a comprehensive multi-disciplinary evaluation for medically fragile infants, children and teens; detects developmental delays early, develops a treatment plan that is family centered and assists with the utilization of community resources as needed. The clinic follows each problem to ensure that the child receives corrective treatment. Children are referred to the clinic from medical professionals, parents, family, friends or community/state agencies.
What it reported doing in 2024
Comprehensive evaluation of children with suspected physical or emotional disorders. The clinic provided a comprehensive multi-disciplinary evalatuion for medically fragile infants, children and teens; detected developmental delays early, developed a family centered treatment plan and assisted with the utiliztion of community resources as needed. The clinic served in a supportive partnership with medical, educational, and psycho- social services for children with special health care needs, so that total care was provided in a context that is family centered, community based and culturally competent. Followed each problem to ensure that the child received corrective treatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.3%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 94%; rating input score 94
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.24; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -13.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.3% of revenue deployed · 94% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $221K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.