Child Care Resource Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510138647
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2012
Location
Cambridge, MA, USA
Phone
6175471063
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,503,206
Expenses
$8,981,472
Assets
$237,961
Liabilities
$163,676

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ccrc promoted the healthy development and well-being of children by supporting the adults who care for them. Its primary goal was to ensure that all children have access to the supports and resources they need to thrive and succeed in school and life. Continued on page 24.to accomplish this, ccrc provided access to services and resources for families, offered training for early childhood professionals and built community intiatives and partnerships that benefited children.each year ccrc provided direct services to over 5,000 families, circulated resource information to thousands of local parents, and offered professional support and training to over 600 early education and childcare programs and individual care providers.

What it reported doing in 2012

Collaborations - ccrc served as a home to and supported intiatives that were compatible with its mission. The cambridge community partnerships for children, a component of the cambridge coordinated family and community engagement grant program, provided families with access to comphrehensive services and support that strengthened families and promoted opitimal child development.the chna 17 and chna 18 programs promoted healthier people and healthier communities by providing a forum to identify, prioritize, collaberate, design and track local and regional health promotion stratergies and to tell the stories of lessons learned. Ccrc also worked in collaberations with other advocacy groups to educate national, state and local policymakers about the importance of affordable, quality early education and care. Management expects the collaboration programs not to be funded during fiscal 2014 and intends to fulfill its responsibility for service delivery until existing funding is exhausted.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.69; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -68.4% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -121.6% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 10 of 11 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $8.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.