Child - Adult Food Entree
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272382109
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Richardson, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2149236221
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Congregate Meals
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $31,769
- Expenses
- $32,384
- Assets
- $4,565
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Child / Adult Food Entre Sponsorship of Texas (Caf Texas) executes administrative responsibilities of the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Child Nutrition Programs (CNP). Caf Texas provides education, training, and funding to child care centers and programs that participate in the CACFP to supplement the cost of food service operations.
What it reported doing in 2012
In 2011, the organization was created and began the application process to become an approved administrator for the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) for the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Child Nutrition Programs (CNP). Approval was granted in 2012 and the organization anticipates signing up centers in 2012 to begin program administration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.5%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 76%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.14; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 94.3% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.5% of revenue deployed · 76% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.