Child Abuse Prevention Council
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421134180
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Des Moines, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5157252682
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $78,871
- Expenses
- $74,551
- Assets
- $30,150
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the Child Abuse Prevention Council is to provide an organized channel through which concerned individuals can contribute to and participate in child abuse prevention efforts in the community.
What it reported doing in 2012
Parenting Classes are offered in several different Polk County locations each quarter. All classes are free and some provide a free meal and childcare. Classes are held one night each week for one to two hours and last four to twelve weeks. Curiculums include: Parenting Children 0-5; Active Parenting now for School Age Children; Real Life Parenting Skills for PArents in Recovery; Parenting Children with Behavioral Difficulties; Avoiding Power Struggles for Parents of Teens and other developed to meet special needs. The Child Abuse Council also offers training for caregivers called Nurturing Healthy Sexual Development or How to Protect Children from Sexual Abuse. These trainings are designed to help adults learn how to protect children from sexual abuse and are provided for specific at-risk populations and the general public.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 31
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.7%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 32.5%; rating input score 32
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.7% of revenue deployed · 32.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $30K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 32/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.