Chief Petty Officer Association Cpoa

Overview

Mission

To strengthen cohesion within the cpo community and to promote ideals which embody all competencies, values, and characteristics of a chief petty officer by working together for the good of the commands and community. To provide an effective and stimulating environment for the exchange of ideas and constructive debate dissemination of leadership, managerial, personal, and technical information mutual assistance to the active duty, reserve, and retired cpos in the fort meade area. To reinforce the responsibilities, leadership, characteristics, and privileges of cpos. To provide a forum for members to keep informed of u.s. Navy policies so we may continue to loyally serve the nation, our navy, and our sailors. To stress the importance of servant leadership to our members and effectively mentor those sailors who have not yet attained the title of chief petty officer. To develop and promote fellowship, to assemble for social exchanges with families and friends, and to foster ca

Operating model

Revenue model

Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.

Distribution model

Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 96
• Transparency & Controls: 82
• Sustainability: 10
• Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
• Governance: Filed governance answers
• Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $146K in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
• Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
• Schedules: 1 filed schedules
• Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2024
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

• Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
• High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
• High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
• High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
• High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
• High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.