Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363376432
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7732485200
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$26,435,859
Expenses
$25,463,707
Assets
$19,317,995
Liabilities
$8,908,296

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL HERMAN (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL HERMAN (CEO): $245,000 total reported compensation
  • JUDITH K PERLOFF (CHIEF PGM OFF.): $170,852 total reported compensation
  • JOSIE PAUL (CHIEF ADMN OFFICER): $138,667 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by HIV/AIDS

What it reported doing in 2024

Prevention - h.o.p.e. (healthy, outreach, prevention and education). Historically, AIDS prevention focused on those who were HIV negative, helpting them to not become positive. Since 2002, chicago house pioneered the prevention with positives initiative with one underlying principle: every new infection is contracted from someone who is already HIV impacted. If "safe" practices can be encouraged among those who are HIV positive, it can help stem the tide of AIDS whole keeing those already impacted from contracting a drug resistant strain of HIV. The h.o.p.e. Department is an HIV prevention program involving three core services: HIV testing and counseling, care coordination for persons living with HIV and care navigation for individuals at high risk for HIV. HIV testing and counseling is provided for persons living with HIV who are having difficulty maintaining safer sex or needle sharing behaviors. Factors that may impact a client's ability to maintain safer behaviors include: mental illness, homelessness or risk of homelessness, domestic violence, and substance abuse. The HIV prevention counselor works one-on-one with clients to assist them with achieving risk reduction goals. HIV rapid testing is also provided. This program seeks to help identify some of the estimated 25% of individuals in the united states with HIV who are unaware of their HIV status. Care coordination chicago house addresses the needs of out-of-care people living with HIV/AIDS and offer retention-in-care activities. Connect to care provides client level outreach, linkage, and education activities to help individuals with diagnosed HIV/AIDS connect or reconnect to continuous HIV medical care and other essential services. The program recruits case managed clients to conduct outreach to out-of-care people living with HIV in their social networks and facilitates efforts to(re)connect them to HIV care services. In addition, the program provides newly connected clients educational and peer-based services and addresses clients' individual-level barriers, such as fear, stigma, or lack of knowledge about treatment in order to support care retention.prep navigation chicago house addresses the needs of high risk negatives by creating a client centered approach to care that mirrors our care coordination model. Regardless if a client is HIV positive or at high-risk for contracting HIV they are in need of the same type of services. Because prep requires adherence, the care navigation program gives navigators the opportunity to work with clients over an extended period of time, allowing them to develop a deeper relationship with the client and a more comprehensive negative care care plan, similar to what is done with HIV positive clients. The navigator ensures that they schedule regular follow-up meetings with the client to continue to test the client for HIV, to ensure the referral is continuing to serve the client, and to address any other needs that may arise as the client becomes more comfortable with the navigator.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 85% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.9%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: $64.1 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.46; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.9% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 19 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $23.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $245K · 21 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 30 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 8 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.