Chicago Family Health Center Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453732286
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021
Location
Chicago, IL, USA
Phone
7737685000
Rating
46
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$21,547
Expenses
$59,092
Assets
$83,342
Liabilities
$87,299

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRAIG MANSKE (PRESIDENT)
  • NICK VALADEZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • BARRETT HATCHES (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

People named in this filing

  • ALEX LICKERMAN (DIRECTOR)
  • JIM PRISTER (DIRECTOR)
  • NORA REYES (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary exempt purpose of chicago family health center foundation is to support chicago family health center, inc., a 501(c)(3) organization.

What it reported doing in 2021

The foundation will help support the center by raising and continuously maintaining an amount of principal that can generate enough interest to help fund the center's operations at the request of the center. The foundation will undertake the process of capital campaigns. The foundation will further hold an annual dinner gala for friends of the foundation and center where proceeds from the gala will be granted to the center. The foundation plans to eventually create a website that will accept on-line donations. The foundation may develop an annual fund. Money raised by the foundation will be granted to the center from time to time to help fund its operations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -174.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.