Chi Omega Fraternity Pi Alpha Chapter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 316079821
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Phone
- 5136146727
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,249
- Expenses
- $131,465
- Assets
- $50,307
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KATELYTN WISE (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
- ANNIE DETTWILLER (CHAPTER VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KATELYTN WISE (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
- ANNIE DETTWILLER (CHAPTER VICE PRESIDENT)
- LINDSEY ARCHIABLE (CHAPTER SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To nbsp; promote nbsp; lasting nbsp; and nbsp; enduring nbsp; friendships nbsp; among nbsp; its nbsp; memebers nbsp; to nbsp; foster nbsp; high nbsp; standard nbsp; of nbsp; intellectual nbsp; achievement nbsp; and nbsp; ethical nbsp; behavior nbsp; among nbsp; its nbsp; members nbsp; to nbsp; promote nbsp; the nbsp; education nbsp; of nbsp; its nbsp; chapter nbsp; members nbsp; and nbsp; to nbsp; promiote nbsp; the nbsp; educational nbsp; and nbsp; social nbsp; millieu nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; college nbsp; where nbsp; its nbsp; chapter nbsp; of nbsp; chi nbsp; omega nbsp; fratenity nbsp; is nbsp; established nbsp; and nbsp; to nbsp; promote nbsp; developement nbsp; of nbsp; education nbsp; and nbsp; advancement nbsp; of nbsp; its nbsp; members
What it reported doing in 2024
Recruitment pledging new member education and initiation expense recruitment program involving all chapter members recruiting for new members and programming for providing new member orientation learning and ongoing member education
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 84% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 80
- Accountability: 18
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 79%; rating input score 79; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $124K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 15 of 18 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules · includes grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Assets line sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.