Chi Kappa of Chi Omega Fraternity
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237120437
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Fairfax, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5712794583
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Sororities, Fraternities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,715
- Expenses
- $70,250
- Assets
- $119,560
- Liabilities
- $76,022
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMERSON MARIE MATTIE (PRESIDENT)
- AVERY SHIPPEN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- HANNAH MARIE COLLADO (NEW MEMBER EDUCATOR)
- JULIA YEBIN KANG (TREASURER)
- LUCIANA VICENDESE (DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMMING)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Chi omega is a sisterhood that provides a network of friends and lifelong development for collegiate and alumnae members, committed to personal integrity, excellence in academic and intellectual pursuits, inter-generational participation, community service, leadersjip opportunities, and social enrichment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chi omega's vision is to be the premier national women's organization in the 21st century and to establish renewed value and respect for all women by promoting 1) high moral standards and ethics, 2) personal growth, 3) professional development, and 4) a network of friendship and support for life
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 41.8%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.64; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 41.8% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.