Chevy Chase at Home Incorporated
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 270204031
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Chevy Chase, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3016573115
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $157,950
- Expenses
- $142,647
- Assets
- $274,761
- Liabilities
- $6,610
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- KAREN BOKAT (DIRECTOR)
- SUSAN KAHN (DIRECTOR)
- BOB LEIBENLUFT (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose of the organization is to provide a community network of volunteer support services that enable older residents of the chevy chase, Maryland area to remain independent at home.
What it reported doing in 2025
Cc@h continued to build a caring community for older adults in 2025. We provided a wide range of practical services and social connections from rides to helping with errands, minor home repairs, and technology, to brightening the day with a friendly call or visit all making it easier for older adults to living confidently at home and stay engaged in the community. In addition, we continued to provide programs for the community at large. Through the efforts of cc@h staff and volunteers, 90 community members received their vaccine booster at our vaccine clinic at chevy chase village hall in the fall. We assisted members to obtain vaccine clinic appointments, provided rides to members to receive the vaccine booster, and organized the vaccine clinic in partnership with chevy chase village. We continued to provide online and in-person programs such as our interest groups, social events, and museum visits. Our shared interest and exercise groups met regularly. We also continued to offer our monthly speaker series, featuring distinguished members of the community, as well as information and cultural programs. In addition, we provided quarterly newsletters and weekly e-newsletters to our members and volunteers with articles, information, and a calendar of events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.8%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.7%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.93; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 90.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $143K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.