Chevrolet Nomad Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 363627208
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2020–2024
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2024
Location: Bellwood, NE, USA
Phone: 3084402643
Rating: 87
Verdict: STRONG
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $83,743
Expenses: $85,412
Assets: $101,473

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

GREG MCCOLLOUGH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

JASON MYERS (DIRECTOR)
ALANA CROUCH (SECRETARY)
BILL MACOUBRIE (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The chevrolet nomad association is dedicated to the preservation, promotion, and enjoyment of nomad station wagons built by chevrolet during the model years 1955, 1956, and 1957. Membership is open to any person or business who supports the purpose of the club. Ownership of a nomad is not a requirement. To encourage family participation, membership includes the member's spouse. Each is entitled to vote on club business.

What it reported doing in 2024

The association publishes and distributes the nomad post magazine to members, which includes advertising to preserve and restore the 1955, 1956, and 1957 nomads. 1200 members

Operating model

Revenue model: Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 95
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 40
Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 95.7%; rating input score 96
Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: -2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: 20% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 95.7% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $80K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
Schedules: 1 filed schedules
Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 51/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.