Chetek Bulldog Booster Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392043868
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Chetek, WI, USA
Phone
7156512889
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,541
Expenses
$56,353
Assets
$29,648

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ERIC HEPFLER (PRESIDENT)
  • NICK SATHER (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ERIC HEPFLER (PRESIDENT)
  • NICK SATHER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ANNE KONVICKA (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support youth athletics

What it reported doing in 2018

Sponsor saturday and summer basketball and baseball for over 250 children ages 8 to 18. Have raised and donated over $100000.00 for football field seating and lighting. Donated $2000.00 to the high school weight room which bennefits over 450 individuals. Maintain 4 baseball/softball feilds in the community. Sponsor youth wrestling tournament which as 300 children ages 5 to 14 participating from communities within a 50 mile radius. Provide uniforms and various equipment for community and school athletic programs and have purchased and donated $2500.00 for batting cages and pitching mounds.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.9%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.