Chesterton Academy of Saint Padre Pio
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923479020
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Sarasota, FL, USA
- Phone
- 9413466757
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Secondary, High School
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $426,337
- Expenses
- $484,252
- Assets
- $36,650
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Nadia Smith (President)
- Maria DiMenna (Treasurer and Executive Director (July-May))
Highest reported compensation
- Carolyn Dutton (Headmistress): $34,375 total reported compensation
- Mary Colleen Roca (Board Member (July-Jan)): $5,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Inspired by Saint Pope John Paul II, we take as our motto Cultura Vitae, the Culture of Life. We make it our mission to prepare our students to triumph over the materialism and despair that pervade our culture and to accept our Lord's offer to have life and have it abundantly. Our classical curriculum combines a broad liberal arts education with a strong emphasis on the cultivation of Christian virtues and an appreciation of beauty.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chesterton Academy of St. Padre Pio opened doors in August 2024, welcoming the inaugural class with offerings for ninth and tenth grades. The fiscal year spanning July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 marked our first year of operation and was a year of many significant milestones. Among the highlights was the first Fine Arts Night, an evening that showcased student learning in art, drama, dance, and music-cornerstones of our curriculum. Parents were especially struck by what their children accomplished, particularly students who might not ordinarily choose to perform on stage. The growth in character, confidence, and self-expression was remarkable to witness. Hosting such an event in a school's first year was also a noteworthy achievement within the Chesterton Schools Network. Academically, several students earned top honors on the National Latin Exam and performed well on the national Classical Learning Test. Despite being in the inaugural year, several universities visited the school to meet with the students, a testament to the strong national reputation of Chesterton Academies. The school also successfully met all operational expenses through fundraising efforts, drawing support from both large and small donors throughout Sarasota and Manatee counties. These generous benefactors share the belief in the mission and recognized the value of offering a Catholic classical education in the community. As the fiscal year came to a close, CASPP reflected carefully on both the successes and areas for improvement and immediately began implementing changes to strengthen operations and support continued growth. The school looks ahead with gratitude and hope, confident that the year to come will bear abundant fruit through these efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.7%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 72.1%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.87 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 109.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -88.3% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 81.7% of revenue deployed · 72.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $349K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.