Chesterfield Kiwanis Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541484517
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2010
Location
Midlothian, VA, USA
Phone
8046527145
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$12,671
Expenses
$4,147
Assets
$239,106
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Stephen Francis (President)
  • Wayne Campton (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Stephen Francis (President)
  • Robert T Benton (Treasurer)
  • Patrick Knightly (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Children's Benevolence. The Kiwanis Foundation of M-C is dedicated to helping children and their families in need or in crisis in Chesterfield County and the U. S. During 2025 1 grant of $4,000 was provided to such an organization for this purpose. These children or a family member likely live far away and need a place to stay while getting treated for cancer or other diseases. The family receives a place to stay (at very low rate) and some basic food while the sick family member is being treated at the nearby VCU Medical Center.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provided Doorways (54-1240348) a $4,000 grant to assisted with its mission of providing safe, affordable, comfortable lodging (& some meals) for families in medical crisis by operating over 112 guest rooms in an old, renovated hotel.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 44.9%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 96.5%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 67.3%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 57.66; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 100% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 44.9% of revenue deployed · 96.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.