Chester Pike Corridor Improvement Partners

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
844884748
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Norwood, PA, USA
Phone
7178312559
Rating
47
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$181,401
Expenses
$103,968
Assets
$139,282
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TANYA ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK O'CONNELL (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TANYA ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK O'CONNELL (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • TOM KIELY (SECRETARY (THRU 6/13/24))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create a vibrant and inclusive chester pike corridor that preserves its historic character while embracing sustainable transportation solutions and fostering economic growth. This includes the boroughs of glenolden, norwood, prospect park, ridley park and sharon hill.

What it reported doing in 2025

A key accomplishment of the cpcip has been the successful implementation of elements from the chester pike corridor master plan, launched in december 2022. This includes a focus on streetscaping improvements, such as enhanced crosswalk visibility, the installation of branded street signs and poles to create a unified visual identity, and the placement of a welcome sign and planter box. Furthermore, the cpcip has initiated a comprehensive multimodal study to identify and prioritize improvements along the corridor. We have also actively engaged with the broader planning community by presenting the chester pike corridor initiative at the Pennsylvania chapter of the american planning association conference.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 82% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 42.7%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.34; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 60.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.