Crisp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
270332436
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Columbia, MD, United States
Phone
877-952-7477
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$48,863,145
Expenses
$48,487,235
Assets
$15,933,888
Liabilities
$6,988,834

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CRAIG BEHM (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • CRAIG BEHM (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $480,974 total reported compensation
  • RYAN BRAMBLE (VP AND CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $378,890 total reported compensation
  • NICHOLE SWEENEY (VP AND GENERAL COUNSEL): $329,992 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our Vision Guiding Principles CRISP Timeline Our Mission We will enable and support the healthcare community of Maryland and our region to appropriately and securely share data in order to facilitate care, reduce costs, and improve health outcomes. We will enable and support the healthcare community of Maryland and our region to appropriately and securely share data in order to facilitate care, reduce costs, and improve health outcomes. CRS monthly hospital reports grow from 2 to 17. The tableau reporting tool is turned on (March) HSCRC funds the ICN project for infrastructure to support care management (August). 2017 – Comprehensive Medicare Data CRISP launches a new reporting and analytics platform leveraging comprehensive, Maryland-wide Parts A, B, and D Medicare claim. The launch provides timely population-level data to all hospitals and patient-level data to state policymakers...

What it reported doing in 2024

Health information exchange (hie)- crisp continues to focus on the exchange. Since build-out of the exchange, crisp hie has allowed providers practicing at one location to instantly access patients' records, test results, and other important information even if that information is physically stored miles away in several unrelated locations. A brief description of the hie concept is as follows: while physician access is improved by an hie, so is the security of patients' medical information. Secure electronic transmission of medical data ensures that it has reached the intended recipient and only the intended recipient. Continued on schedule othe instantaneous near real time access and improved security offered by a hie is made possible by the high-speed computer networking hardware used to connect all participating health care facilities and identify the location of patient records within those participating facilities. Increased availability and security of patient information reduces errors, improves patient care, and lowers health care costs. The hie also permits, on a vast scale, the collection of epidemiological and other data providing unique scientific and educational opportunities. Through its ability to access and "de-identify" (remove identifying information, such as names or social security numbers) patient records from many (if not all) of a region's patients, crisp will help providers and public health staff reliably determine the most successful treatments, recognize important areas in need of quality improvement, and identify medical errors and other inefficiencies (such as treatment complications) across an entire region. In sum, hies permit healthcare providers to exchange data on an unprecedented scale which should improve treatment outcomes and lowers healthcare costs for all. Additionally, hies provide a unique public health, scientific and educational opportunity. Crisp intends to operate its hie in such a way as to facilitate all educational and scientific uses of its hie that will not compromise data security or privacy. As crisp develops and gains access to an increasing amount of medical and health data, facilitation will include 1) working with participants to identify areas worth of study and/or research, 2) developing means for data collection while maintaining data security and privacy, and 3) promoting the use of appropriate data mined from crisp in scientific studies and educational settings.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 87% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 81
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.5%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 88.2%; rating input score 88
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.44; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 87.5% of revenue deployed · 88.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $42.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $481K · 27 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.5M reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.