Chesapeake City District Civic Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237068442
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Chesapeake City, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3022185983
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Neighborhood, Block Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,433
- Expenses
- $33,699
- Assets
- $103,753
- Liabilities
- $50,856
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT FOARD JR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT FOARD JR (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose for which the association is organized and shall be operated are exclusively charitable and educational. For the general purposes aforesaid, and limited to those purposes, the objects to be carried on by it are as follows: to combat community deterioration and juvenile delinquency, advance education, lessen neighborhood tensions, support and promote the quality of community life, stimulate rehabilitation of the community; to advance and disseminate knowledge concerning and moral, social, economic and physical problems facing the community; and strive to alleviate problems related to urban crisis; to provide assistance, council and advice to all persons in the community, particularly property owners, prospective property owners, and others having an interest in the improvement and proper maintenance, of the properties for the purpose of eliminating existing blight and guarding against future deterioration; to develop, sponsor, promote, initiate and foster charitable and educ
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose for which the association is organized and shall be operated are exclusively charitable and educational. For the general purposes aforesaid, and limited to those purposes, the objects to be carried on by it are as follows: to combat community deterioration and juvenile delinquency, advance education, lessen neighborhood tensions, support and promote the quality of community life, stimulate rehabilitation of the community; to advance and disseminate knowledge concerning and moral, social, economic and physical problems facing the community; and strive to alleviate problems related to urban crisis; to provide assistance, council and advice to all persons in the community, particularly property owners, prospective property owners, and others having an interest in the improvement and proper maintenance, of the properties for the purpose of eliminating existing blight and guarding against future deterioration; to develop, sponsor, promote, initiate and foster charitable and educational programs designed to contribute to the enrichment of community life and harmonious community relations and to encourage broadest possible participation by individuals and groups and maximum citizen participation in activities directed towards these purposes
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 28
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.8%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 28
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.08; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.7% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -7% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.8% of revenue deployed · 28.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.