Cherry Valley Community Facilities
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 161499182
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Cherry Valley, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6072649300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $-10,301
- Expenses
- $46,358
- Assets
- $1,578,150
- Liabilities
- $530,732
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
People named in this filing
- MICHELLE BOSMA (DIRECTOR)
- TIM BOUCHARD (DIRECTOR)
- JACKIE DELONG (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Restore the former school building for a range of charitable community purposes.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community center provided a facility for seniors, teens and individuals and a gym for use by the town and village.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 82.5%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $32.38 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -550%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 34.04; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.34; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.5% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 82.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.