Cherokee County Humane Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581588122
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Woodstock, GA, USA
- Phone
- 7709285115
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $359,600
- Expenses
- $416,791
- Assets
- $314,928
- Liabilities
- $886
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IRENE MOORE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- IRENE MOORE (PRESIDENT)
- BRUCE J BISSELL (VICE-PRES.)
- NANCY GAYLER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Prevention of animal cruelty.
What it reported doing in 2024
The cherokee county humane society (cchs) remained focused on its five primary goals: saave- save, alter, adopt, vaccinate and end euthanasia. We rescued, adopted, altered and aided in excess of 1,000 animals and 500+ pet owners in 2024. The adopted animals were rescued primarily from overcrowded shelters and individuals who abandoned or turned in their pets. All of the animals adopted by cchs are vaccinated, dewormed, and tested for diseases. Then, they were spayed/neutered, flea treated and microchipped. No animal leaves cchs without medical clearance, being spayed or neutered, and heartworm tested. If a dog tests positive, then it is treated. In tandem with the medical requirements, all for adoption animals are quarantined at approved foster homes as cchs does not have a physical shelter. We also provided dog/cat food to indigent pet owners who cannot afford to feed their pets. Cchs provides basic feline and k-9 shots at no charge. Plus, we offer deworming liquid as parasites are a frequent problem. In addition, through program services, cchs continues to help indigent pet owners by providing much needed medical attention to animals who otherwise would not receive care. Often, indigent pet owners are elderly individuals whose family are their pets. Cchs continues to regularly support spay and neuter clinics for local dogs and cats which are held in mobile units and through support of the all the fixins formerly known as Georgia animal project (gap) which has its own spay/neuter surgical facility in ball ground, cherokee county. In 2024, cchs helped or paid for multiple spays/neuters of over 150 local pets - this is in addition to those 1,000+ spayed and neutered prior to adoption. We continue to sponsor low-cost shot/vaccination clinics called catsnip clinics at the in our geographic area. Rabies shots are a requirement in Georgia. Diseases like parvo, distemper, feline leukemia and feline HIV are often fatal. Thus, cchs provides the opportunity for pet owners to save their pets. Finally, we help to educate school children and communities by speaking at various grade, middle and high school organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 88% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 31.2%; rating input score 31
- Program expense ratio: 27%; rating input score 27
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.14 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1.6% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 31.2% of revenue deployed · 27% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 53/100.