Cherokee Charter Academy Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 820916738
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2017–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022
- Location
- Canton, GA, USA
- Phone
- 6783857322
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Charter Schools
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,489,718
- Expenses
- $9,622,204
- Assets
- $21,809,468
- Liabilities
- $25,483,118
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
People named in this filing
- DANNY F DUKES (BOARD CHAIR AND TREASURER)
- DR BOB DURHAM (BOARD CHAIR)
- NATE COCHRAN (VICE CHAIR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Cherokee charter academy will develop in its students a passion and curiosity necessary to become lifelong learners and future leaders while instilling core community values, strong character ethics, and a commitment to excellence.
What it reported doing in 2022
Cherokee charter academy provides tuition-free educational services to students from kindergarten to eighth grade who reside in the Georgia counties of cherokee, pickens, bartow, and cobb.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 97% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 94
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 88.9%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 86
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.3%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.27; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.17; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 44.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 88.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 6 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2017 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.