Chemical Batch Processing Monitoring Group Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN: 954377576
IRS 990-EZ coverage: 2010–2020
Forms available: Form 990-EZ 2020
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone: 2136237515
Rating: 77
Verdict: SUPPORTED
Rating confidence: Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue: $92,500
Expenses: $69,184
Assets: $66,063
Liabilities: $0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

TIMOTHY SIMPSON (CHAIRMAN)
PAUL BREMER (DIRECTOR)
STEVE SILVERMAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Assist members in regulatory compliance

What it reported doing in 2020

Retained outside council to review member compliance procedures to ensure they are in compliance with strict and complex regulations promulgated by California industrial permit authorities.

Operating model

Revenue model: Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model: Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

Financial Efficiency: 81
Transparency & Controls: 82
Sustainability: 60
Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

Mission deployment rate: 71.7%; rating input score 72
Program expense ratio: 95.8%; rating input score 96

Transparency & Controls

Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

Operating margin: 25.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

Program expense growth: -8.9% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Revenue growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

Where the money goes: 71.7% of revenue deployed · 95.8% of spending went to programs
Governance: Filed governance answers
Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $66K in reported program spending
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
Schedules: 1 filed schedules
Filing history: 10 filing years from 2010 to 2020
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.