Cheektowaga Senior Citizens Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223812972
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Cheektowaga, NY, USA
Phone
7166863930
Rating
39
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Senior Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$23,142
Expenses
$23,040
Assets
$118,114
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Timothy Jakubowski (Chairperson)
  • Dawn Frost (Vice Chairperson)
  • Nicole Gawel (Secretary/Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of the Cheektowaga Senior Citizens Foundation is promoting the welfare of the senior citizens of the Town of Cheektowaga by maintaining and supporting a Senior Citizen Center to provide recreation, instruction, social support and other wellness activities coupled with scientific, literary, cultural, educational and charitable purposes.

What it reported doing in 2024

The Cheektowaga Sunshine Group, funded by our Foundation, provides social and recreational outings and visits to the Senior Center for frail, homebound, economically disadvantaged senior who otherwise often at times feel isolated in their homes. Sunshine events are something the participants very much look forward to and are a chance for the members to get out in the community and see the sites and what has changed over the years in and around the Town.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and total assets are large relative to annual expenses, but may not be spendable cash. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.4%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.13; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -48% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 47/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.