Checks and Balances for Economic Growth
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522375626
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2022713959
- Rating
- 57
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interdisciplinary Research
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,104,161
- Expenses
- $5,505,862
- Assets
- $207,264
- Liabilities
- $959,354
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAN PERRIN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DAN PERRIN (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR): $109,550 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage in research and public awareness relating to the positive impact public activities have on governmental activities and programs.
What it reported doing in 2013
Public awareness - identification of grassroots activities, polling, and personal contact on issues relating to the current financial situation of the u.s. Social security system and the potential reduction of benefits to the public and on social security petitions and surveys.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 30
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.5%; rating input score 56
- Program expense ratio: 52.4%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.31 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.04; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.63; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 30.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.5% of revenue deployed · 52.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $110K · 3 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.5M reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.