Checkit4andretti Charitable Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 851422815
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Davidson, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7046642809
- Rating
- 62
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health, General and Financing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $150,549
- Expenses
- $48,735
- Assets
- $917,778
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NANCY ANDRETTI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NANCY ANDRETTI (PRESIDENT)
- JF THORMANN (CHAIRMAN)
- AMELIA ANDRETTI (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To save lives by increasing awareness of the importance of screenings in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer, and by providing funding to high risk, low income patients who are uninsured, underinsured, or too young for insurance to cover the cost of screening.
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2025 the checkit4andretti foundation continued to grow in many ways. We were able to increase our followers on all our social media channels, which in turn raises awareness for the importance of colorectal screening. We were able to pay for colonoscopies for those that would otherwise be unable to afford this important screening. Checkit4andretti continues to meet and work on more partnerships in nc, South Dakota, tx, and Indiana. In addition to these advances in our organization, we continue to raise funds so that we may help even more people in need. This year we held out first major fundraiser "the inagural checkit4andretti pickleball tournament".
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 81% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 36
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: 91
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 23.1%; rating input score 23
- Program expense ratio: 71.4%; rating input score 71
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 67.6%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.83; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 48.7% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 23.1% of revenue deployed · 71.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 5 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.