Chdfs Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460506221
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 2126954564
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,702,605
- Expenses
- $8,640,352
- Assets
- $6,134,311
- Liabilities
- $6,000,436
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUAN CARLOS VILLAMIZAR (President)
Highest reported compensation
- JUAN CARLOS VILLAMIZAR (President): $218,400 total reported compensation
- CARLOS FLORES (CARE MANAGER): $116,871 total reported compensation
- ROSA M CACCAMO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $109,018 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide intensive in-home support to developmentally and emotionally disturbed children and adolescents and their families.
What it reported doing in 2024
Chdfs provides homemaking services through a contract with the administration for children's services (acs). Acs refers cases to chdfs that they have determined to be in need of a homemaker. Homemaker services are delivered by home care paraprofessionals who work with families; children and youth affected by trauma, including those impacted by adverse child welfare outcomes; pregnant and parenting adolescents; and families at risk for repeat maltreatment. Homemakers teach parents and guardians to care for children safely in their homes and work with families in crisis to address trauma with positive coping competencies. Families receiving homemaking services typically have children who are aged 12 and under. Homemakers work with the whole family to help parents and guardians apply protective factors in their everyday settings to achieve the best outcomes for the children. Homemakers also work to engage parents in activities designed to improve child functioning across developmental areas and educate parents about child development and strategies to prepare children for educational settings while promoting positive parent-child interactions. Homemaker services are intended to strengthen family life and promote healthy family functioning to prevent the placement of children into foster care, whenever possible.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 91.2%; rating input score 91
- Program expense ratio: 91.9%; rating input score 92
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.98; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.4%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.4% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 18.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 91.2% of revenue deployed · 91.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $7.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $218K · 7 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 45/100.