Chatham Soccer League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561822127
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Pittsboro, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9195421414
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $55,852
- Expenses
- $46,302
- Assets
- $95,619
- Liabilities
- $17,714
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Hall (President)
- Ed Grealey (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Mark Hall (President)
- Ed Grealey (Vice President)
- Tom Koziara (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To offer an affordable opportunity for kids to play soccer in Chatham Cty.
What it reported doing in 2020
We offer an affordable opportuinty for children to play either recreational or competitive soccer. Leagues are organized in both the fall and spring and are divided into age specific divisions. Approx 900 participants.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for member benefits.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 77
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17.1%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.07; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.19; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -48.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -1% per year; rating input score 0; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 55/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.