Chase Brexton Health Care

Legal name: Chase Brexton Health Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521638592
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Baltimore, MD, United States
Phone
410-837-2050
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
AIDS

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$172,818,534
Expenses
$165,172,626
Assets
$152,540,617
Liabilities
$26,175,258

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PATRICK MUTCH (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • PATRICK MUTCH (CEO): $544,115 total reported compensation
  • SEBASTIAN RUHS (CMO): $383,204 total reported compensation
  • ERIC TURNBAUGH (CFO): $370,216 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our Mission To provide compassionate, high-quality, and integrated health care that respects the unique needs of each patient and advances wellness in the communities we serve. Our Vision. Staffed with a couple nurses and doctors, a coordinator, and several volunteers, Chase Brexton was open for only two hours two nights a week and our few services were free (donation suggested, to help pay for supplies). Some relocations and staff changes later, by the mid-1980s we found ourselves to be among a limited number of providers on the frontlines of a new epidemic that would become known as HIV/AIDS. It made sense that we took this challenge on. We’d been founded to meet a need that was not readily or safely available, and we grew to meet a need that was dire.

What it reported doing in 2024

Other programs: social work - social workers help people help themselves, including people of every age, religion, culture, race, socioeconomic status or country of origin. Case management is a support system for anyone in need of nearly any type of support to make their quality of life better. Chase brexton's social work department adheres to and bases its provision of services upon the principles and values established by the national association of social workers code of ethics.dental services - chase brexton's dentists and dental hygienists can help improve a patient's smile and get children started for a lifetime of healthy teeth. The dental program provides preventative care for children and adults, restorative care, replacement care, emergency care, routine oral surgical and endodontic treatments and cosmetic and elective care.ob/gyn - chase brexton's ob/gyn team provides medical care to patients from puberty through menopause and beyond. Adult and adolescent gynecology services include routine preventive care, pre-conception counseling, infertility counseling, pregnancy testing, gynecological care including advanced laparoscopy, endocrinology, menopause care, std counseling and obstetrics.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 92% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.23 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.4%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.92; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $137.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $544K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 40 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 53/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.