Charlotte Family Housing
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 581599120
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 704.335.5488
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,411,376
- Expenses
- $3,274,185
- Assets
- $4,337,621
- Liabilities
- $320,401
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Elizabeth Kurtz (Executive Dir.): $124,495 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To transform our community by empowering families experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet and stay there, to find a roof and make it a home, to achieve financial literacy and self-sufficiency – for now, and for the future.
What it reported doing in 2024
Charlotte Family Housing, Inc. is a private, not-for-profit enterprise which works to solve family homelessness through a confidence-building empowerment approach. Charlotte Family Housing focuses on the strength of families and transforms past cycles of trauma through formative, confidence building opportunities of growth and validation. CFH is rooted in empowerment and trauma informed care. At its founding, CFH reimagined a new self-sufficiency pathway (focusing on single mothers) that examined clinical brain research linking trauma and poverty and healthy trauma-informed interventions.CFH provides each family with the opportunity to achieve housing stability and economic confidence through three integrated services: 1. Housing: Families begin in a home-like shelter where barriers to obtaining housing are addressed. Without worrying about where their child will sleep at night, moms can concentrate on goals. CFH assists families in finding rental housing and provides subsidies, preparing them for stable housing within a year or two.2. Trauma Informed Care: CFH's Masters-level clinical social workers (LCSW) provide wraparound services grounded in the practice of recognizing the trauma its families have experienced. Through collaborative, safe relationships anchored in trust, LCSWs address barriers to family stability and facilitate a two-generational pathway to financial literacy, parenting, health, and job readiness. Additionally, CFH families have access to counseling.3. Empowerment Tools: CFH incorporates a stepped approach to empower families to move out of poverty. E.g.: Access reduced rates for critical goods and such as car repairs, computers, and home furnishings Connection to 1:1 financial counseling and banking services Earn Motivational Achievement Points for completing program goals which can be cashed in for gift cards, household items, and transportation gift cards Have savings matched upon program completionCharlotte Family Housing solely focuses on working families who are experiencing homelessness in Mecklenburg County. Soaring rental prices throughout Mecklenburg County are forcing more and more families out of their current residences and into housing and homelessness instability. Due to the current housing and rental market, unforeseen events or chronic circumstances (like a loss of income, illness, family breakup, death in the family, or domestic violence) can result in homelessness. In response to the current housing market, CFH has focused on two different initiatives. First, CFH is working hand in hand with developers to secure access to tax credit units. Partnerships with real estate developers allow access to rental units that might otherwise be inaccessible to the families CFH serves. These new partnerships are expanding the affordable housing inventory. Second, acknowledging that CFH can only minimally impact the affordable housing stock, CFH has placed a greater emphasis on career growth, income increases and work force development. By increasing wages, CFH families are able to better afford housing. CFH measures its progress and success by evaluating how many families maintain housing upon leaving its program. Using Salesforce software for data collection, CFH documents a family's progress at three-month intervals with post-exit surveys for two years after program completion.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 75% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.9%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 80.9%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $7.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.32; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 77.9% of revenue deployed · 80.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.