Charlotte CPCU Society Chapter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 566065123
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Malvern, PA, USA
- Phone
- 8006442101
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,419
- Expenses
- $51,227
- Assets
- $49,158
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Charles Kiser (President)
- Temy Clemmons (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Jessica Lindley (Director)
- David Rabb (Director)
- Matt Thompson (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Charlotte CPCU Society Chapter, Inc. is a community of credentialed property and casualty insurance professionals who promote excellence through ethical behavior and continuing education. The CPCU Society is committed to providing resources, educational programs and Charlotte CPCU Society Chapter, Inc. leadership opportunities that attract talent and enable individuals to expand their technical insurance skills and business capabilities in order to improve the overall performance of the insurance industry while adhering to the highest ethical standards.
What it reported doing in 2025
Throughout the year, the Chapter organizes a number of events designed to provide a platform for team-building, networking, and engaging our members and young generations. Some of the annual events include: CPCU Shadow Day, the Annual Insurance Forum, Golf Tournament, Golf Tournament Fundraiser, and CPCU year-end annual meeting. While the Chapter strives to raise revenue during the sponsored events such as the Annual Insurance Forum, it is done with a goal of hosting the remainder of the events free of charge to our members, as well as providing annual scholarships to students at UNCC and ASU. $8,000 was awarded as part of our annual scholarship funds in 2025. We also send several members to the Leadership Summit and In2Risk conferences that provide plenty of educational and networking opportunities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 80% for direct work, and 20% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $39K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2018 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.