Charlotte Community Health Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562274174
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7043166561
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,849,182
- Expenses
- $9,910,944
- Assets
- $8,411,777
- Liabilities
- $1,996,851
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROLYN ALLISON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYN ALLISON (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $191,550 total reported compensation
- JOANNE TYO (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $162,702 total reported compensation
- NGA TRAN (PHYSICIAN): $149,420 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.
What it reported doing in 2024
Comprehensive primary care services - in 2024, cchc operated five clinic locations and served 6,397 unique patients. The organization delivered 11,858 medical visits, 3,378 dental visits, and 2,002 behavioral health visits. Cchc launched its 340b pharmacy program ensuring patients had access to essential medications, supplies, and health guidance. Additionally, cchc expanded hours of operation at the dave cathcart pediatric clinic to include adult and pediatric medical visits, behavioral health services, and care coordinationenhancing access to vital healthcare services for the community. (continued on schedule o)HIV care and prevention services - cchc expanded its HIV care program by adding two medical providers and integrating dental services. Supported by ryan white funding, the program enhanced access to testing, treatment, and prevention services for vulnerable populations.school-based health services - in partnership with local schools, cchc provided primary and dental care to mckinney-vento eligible students. These services addressed health disparities among children experiencing homelessness or housing instability.opioid abuse treatment program - cchc expanded its opioid abuse treatment program by increasing provider capacity and adding a behavioral health consultant. The program served over 30 patients in 2024, with plans for continued growth.mobile dental clinics - cchc deployed mobile dental units to deliver on-site care at schools and community events, improving access to oral health services for children and families in underserved areas.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 32
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.7%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 67.3%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: $41.82 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.6% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.7% of revenue deployed · 67.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $192K · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $146K reported
- Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.